Disclaimer

  • Just in case it isn't already obvious, all of the posts on this blog are only my opinions and not the opinions of any of my clients, employers, former employers, or anybody else. Let the reader beware, and use these opinions at your own risk!

« Learning To Surf In Retirement | Main | Another Theory For Why Vonage Pulled Their WiFi Phones - Patent Violation »

January 22, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e54f0f53c0883400e55000d2718834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference WiFi VoIP Takes Another Hit:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Justin Hammond

I used Vonage for a couple of years, personally and for business (we had several lines for long distance). I was always very satisfied with our service - in the couple of years and taking into consideration how many lines (5 lines) I could probably count the number of actual Vonage issues I had on 1 hand - and the outages were all very brief. This after resolving all our QoS issues :-)

Gazebo

A main reason for wanting a WiFi phone is for travelling. Yes, keep the Vonage box/router at home with a phone plugged into it. However, when travelling, you now have to take the Vonage router with you (unless you want to talk through your computer). You may also need to carry an analog phone (not all hotels/apartments have phones and some have their own wiring to the wall). Worst, many places no longer have wired access in your room, so you only have WiFi access. If I had a WiFi Vonage phone, I could just use it through the WiFi connection (newer WiFi phones even have browsers for use even when authentication is required). Instead, I have to carry a WiFi-To-Ethernet converter, then plug in the Vonage router, and then plug an Analog Phone. Please!

Mike D

I'm glad I wasn't the only one who thought that Voip over WiFi was a bad (and strange) idea.

We have had Vonage for 18+ months now. The adapter box is hooked up to a multi-handset 5.8 Ghz phone, which has proven to work wonderfully (5.8 so it won't interfere with our Wifi). The other advantage with this setup is that if a handset stops working -- or the base station for that matter -- I don't have to get a new Vonage adapter, just a new phone. I like this separate approach better for the same reason why I don't want my TV to have a built-in DVD player.

As an aside, Vonage has worked very well for us. It transitioned us through a location change across the country. I've had a few minor hiccups along the way, but never any with complete loss of service, and I must be the only one who has never had any problems with Vonage tech support, either in India or in New Jersey.

Michael Graves

Ike,

I've tried several wifi SIP devices and found them all lacking. However, the combination you recommend of an ATA and traditional cordless phone also lacks some of the business features that many would appreciate. I'm just now testing the new Snom M3 SIP/Dect pnones. These look to be an even better approach as they integrate well with an IP-PBX or hosted PBX. I will have a long form review in a few weeks.

Craig Plunkett

You just can't easily do QoS over a cheap home wi-fi network. Its too confusing to the average joe that wants it to work the same as his existing cordless phone. We geeks can make it work, but too many knobs and dials for the masses.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment